I have found the material about
learning disabilities, emotional disturbance and mental retardation
really interesting. Going over how schools, in particular teachers
have the power to determine if a student has a learning disability.
Also I am glad to be aware of how we tend to think of disablitly as a
physical set back and not as a problem “within” a person. After
reviewing how standardized tests are what help determin if a studen
has a learning disabiliy or not, I am upset about the fact that some
students have special needs that arent met, whch can lead to a
misdiagnosis. For example we can take a student whos first language
could be something other english and has difficulties understanding
questions on the standardized test, leading to them aswering
questions wrong. Just like when we had the guest speaker talking
about domestic violence in class, when she handed out those slips
with questions on them in defferent languages, most of us couldnt
answer them. If we were to apply that concept to these student and
put ourselves in their shoes, most of us would have been labeld as
learning disabled. Another point that I thought was interesting was
the point of learning at the “normal” level. Since we are in
college and enrolled in non-special education classes we can be
considered a normal learning student. A great point is who is to say
that we are the norm. I would like to challenge that in comparison
to other people we can be considered “slower.” Lets take student
who really excell in school and go to colleges such as Harvard, Yale,
Stanford, NYU and are considered “genius',” what if we were to
consider those incredibly smart students as the norm because of their
test scores, we who may have scored lower and werent able to get into
said colleges may be thought of as learning disabled. To make my
point, this ideology of what the normal learning rate is, can be
skewed in either direction, placing some people in a lower rank or
higher rank dependning on where that normal area falls. To
incorperate how race, class and gender play into this roll, we can
take into account that most diagnosis are determined by white female
teachers in grades k-12, who are typically in a middle class rank and
believe that their point of view of what normal is applies to
everyone. Factors arent considered when you take a lower class asian
student who's first language was chinese for example, and can
understand whats going on in class, but may have difficulty writing
and reading. I feel as though those two subjects are what can hold a
student of color back from achieveing what is considered the normal
learning process. Unlike math, which is a universal language,
writing and reading in a different language than what you are used
to, can weigh heavily on how you respond to questions. If a teacher
cannot realize that student of color may need more help on these
subjects in order to advance in their studies, they may be placed in
a special education program which can be difficult to get out of,
therefore not allowing the chance to prove thie capability of
learning at the same rate as “normal” students.
word count: 584
ReplyDelete